Q: Is it true that Apple spends more on marketing than it spends on research and development?
Ask Matt on USA Today
A: Given Apple's reputation for being so
innovative, some investors are surprised to learn that it's not in the
top 10 big spenders on research and development. And you're right, Apple does spend more on overhead costs, which includes advertising, than it spends on R&D.
There's no question that Apple has entranced both
consumers and investors. Its lineup of mobile devices has become
mainstream and practically ubiquitous. Many people who were never tempted to dabble with technology before have bought Apple products. Meanwhile,
the company has become an unrivaled corporate power. Apple has
dominated the music industry and tablet computing industry, despite
Amazon.com's efforts, and has even marginalized gaming companies such as
Sony and Nintendo. The company has become so
powerful, it's not only the most valuable company in the world, but
thanks to the premium prices it charges for its products, also a profit
powerhouse.
The numbers bear this out. Companies in the
Standard & Poor's 500 reported 9.4% earnings growth in the fourth
quarter of 2011. Without Apple, profit growth would drop to 6.3%.
Some
investors like to think Apple has invented many of the things consumers
now take for granted in technology by pouring money into R&D. But
that's not entirely the case.
The top 10
companies and the amount they spend on R&D (in billions) in the past
12 months were, according to S&P Capital IQ:
• Microsoft : $9.4
• Intel : $8.4
• Merck : $8.3
• International Business Machines : $6.3
• Cisco Systems : $5.6
Apple
is 18th on the list, spending $2.6 billion, behind other technology
giants such as Microsoft, Intel, IBM, Cisco, Oracle, Qualcomm,
Hewlett-Packard and Amazon.com. Apple's R&D spending as a percentage
of its revenue of $127.8 billion was 2%. What
does Apple spend its money on? The company doesn't break out its
advertising spending. But, like all public companies, it discloses how
much it spends on selling, general and administrative costs, or
SG&A. SG&A is essentially a company's overhead, which includes
executive salaries and advertising. Apple spent $8.3 billion on SG&A
in 2011, which was 6.5% of revenue.
Investors
can compare Apple's spending with a competing PC maker:
Hewlett-Packard. HP spent $3.2 billion in R&D the past 12 months,
which is 2.6% of its $124.5 billion in revenue. Meanwhile, it spent
$13.7 billion on SG&A, which is 11% of revenue. The
fact that Apple is able to spend less on R&D, while still charging
premium prices for its products, is a big reason for its mounting
profits and pile of more than $97 billion in cash and investments.
Competition
usually erodes such lofty profit margins over time. But so far, that
hasn't been the case. Only time will tell if the companies spending more
money on R&D are cooking up products that will be able to challenge
Apple in the next few years.
Matt Krantz
is a financial markets reporter at USA TODAY and author of Investing
Online for Dummies and Fundamental Analysis for Dummies.
No comments:
Post a Comment