Beautiful businesses can be very hard to find. Many have sort of asked opinions on all kinds of sectors. Sorry to say that I am no expert in many sectors in fact although I am learning by the day. No one can know all industries. All I can say is that my journey into world stocks especially US have provided me with a steeper and faster learning curve. It is actually tougher than Malaysia as we probably have the least volatile market.
Anyway, one should always be on a lookout for healthy fantastic businesses. They can be overpriced though - which we should avoid. One may ask, why good quality businesses and not just look for cheap ones which are undervalued? After all Benjamin Graham's principles have been to look for that moat, margin of safety. If a company we find after our valuation is worth RM1 billion for example, the margin of safety of 20% will cause us to buy at below RM800 million valuation.
Well, let me take out a company which I do not buy but it is a beautiful business nevertheless. I do not buy it because it is expensive and I think I can find better value elsewhere - Maxis.
Let's just pullout the latest balance sheet. See below - imagine yourself looking at the balance sheet without knowing the name of the company. If I do not show you the name of the company, you would probably be thinking that it is insolvent!!! Intangible assets at RM11.13 billion while equity at RM7.246 billion. If we are doing a debt / (equity - intangibles), what would your result be? The NTA is actually negative (RM7.246b - RM11.13b)
Asset and Liability portion |
Equity portion |
Again cashflow and the predictability of the cash that it can bring in. The second part is more important - predictable cashflow. And bear in mind, Maxis is paying more than RM2.5 billion dividends a year. Only consistent cashflow and the predictability of it can pull that out. Imagine a business that generates free cashflow of RM2.5 billion in one year and another year it generates negative cashflow. What would a bank (or bond subscribers) do?
Now ever wonder why a quality company with good consistent cashflow is important. It does not need to keep the current portion of the cash in fact - and people still believe in the company.
14 comments:
I have invested in Maxis almost from Day 1 of its re-listing. However, I have sold half of my holdings last year when its share price exceeded RM6.80 (Dividend Yield below 6%). My main reason for reducing my holdings is mainly due to the fact that valuation even from a DDM perspective is getting a bit stretch.
Looking at their last few quarter results and you can see that Maxis is struggling to grow its revenue and bottom line mainly due to saturated mobile market and high capex & opex to compete in the highly competitive broadband market. Once interest rates begin to rise which is expected after 2nd half of 2013 due to higher inflation, Maxis' borrowing cost will also rise due to its high gearing. This will impact its free cash flow and ability to maintain its 40 sen dividend payout yearly as current dividend payout ratio is more than 100% of its free cash flow.
Your views on my comments is much appreciated.
Like I said, the CFO's bigger headache or rather CEO is to maintain the dividend not the debt. The debt he will rollover.
Maxis is yes, having problem maintaining market share.
The pie of Maxis had been eated by Digi and Celcom, this few years we saw tremendous result by Digi. Which i know why the new CEO has a lot of work to do.
Yup guess that's why Maxis just hired ex-Digi CEO
Maxis dividend "policy" is not sustainable, which is why the company will be restructuring its future dividend payouts. I work in Maxis but I don't invest in the company, at least not yet, I didn't even take up the ESOS. Instead, I am heavily invested in the yellowman. Also, Celcom will overtake Maxis market share in post+prepaid anytime soon.
Great stuffs from an insider. Haha. Wow!!!
BTW, just a note, if anyone wants to buy the yellowman, do look at Timecom...look at one of my post on Timecom
Maxis just hired ex-Digi CEO.
They definitely hired the wrong one.
Market share in telcos is not big secret. I just read an article in the new Focus Malaysia tat claimed Maxis commanding 12.8m subs while Celcom has already 12.4m. So, it's not much of an insider news :-) Timecom has new iron lady on-board who was ex-CFO of Maxis, Rossana Annizah - now I view that as positive development for Timecom. @ BigSea : Dennelind is a non-techy guy (ex CMO -> CFO -> CEO). so he will need to bring in his own trusted righthand-man on the CTO seat to secure his rein in maxis. my own personal opinion...
Do take a look at Axiata, the management has change a lot after Kamaruddin take over the CEO post.
And take note of its cash flow and profit, the value added point is their exposure of regional business.
Ya, Axiata is definitely the more promising one among the mobile telcos, its growth path look more exciting. I think you are referring to Jamaluddin? ex- Maxis CEO? Once I sat next to him attending a forum - very nice guy.
The reason I pulled out Maxis is because its balance sheet is rather unique (really high debt, low equity, low cash) - never meant to provide any recommendation.
Wow..Maxis taking full advantage of its credentials and ak..doing business at its best using OPM to the max...how many businesses can afford to have balance sheet as such...unique indeed!
Well written!
I agree, Time.com is the emerging contender. I work in the telco line and this company is the one to look out for!
Post a Comment